🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states